Some Mock constructors insert the pointer to the Mock itself into a
global registry. Since GCC cannot see how the pointer is used (only as
an identifier), it cannot tell that the object doesn't need to be
initialized at that point at all. Work around this by using uintptr_t
instead.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 452380347
Change-Id: Ia5a493057ed90719de1d0efab71de9a8a08ddf8b
This fixes unused parameter errors under both MSVC and clang (when
`-Werror=unused-parameter` is used, as reported
[here](9d21db9e0a (r74769946))).
Fixes#3858
PiperOrigin-RevId: 451907906
Change-Id: Ic07da19ea6a547eb1797fbbab19cd57cc2a83fe8
Do this by ripping out the "untyped perform action" machinery, which isn't
necessary: we can simply template the entry point on the result type, and use
RAII to avoid the need to special case void. This makes it easier to understand
the code and harder to introduce type-related undefined behavior, to boot.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 451493451
Change-Id: I225305f83164752ca92f2916721972eafba33168
Previously this excluded callables that return non-moveable types. This is the
same as the
[libc++ std::is_invocable_r bug](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55346)
fixed by
[this commit](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c3a24882903d): it's
wrong to use std::is_convertible for checking the return type, since (despite
its name) that doesn't check the standard-defined notion of "implicitly
convertible". Instead we must base the check on whether the source type can be
used as an argument to a function that accepts the destination type.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 451341205
Change-Id: I2530051312a0361ea7a2ce26993ae973c9242089
In order to make the diff more readable in an upcoming commit that requires the
method to be templated on the action's result type.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 451157029
Change-Id: I57beb7544efccd0459efb3a1f039ea45cd7c7602
`Return(x)` can now be used directly with `WillOnce` (the only place it makes
sense in the type system), without using `ByMove`.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 448380066
Change-Id: Ia71cc60ccbc3b99720662731a2d309735a5ce7c8
It doesn't make semantic sense for the conversion to modify the input, and the
fact that it's allowed to do so appears to have just been a historical accident.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 448135555
Change-Id: Id10f17af38cf3947ee25fe10654d97527173ebfc
Better document requirements, API decisions, and historical accidents. Make an
implicit conversion easier and in a more appropriate place, and ease the burden
of some assertions in the conversion operator. Stop using the legacy
ActionInterface style for defining the action.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 447894892
Change-Id: I179e23ec2abdd9bf05c204ab18dbb492f1372e8e
So that it can be referenced in conversion operators for actions that need to
know the concrete return type.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 447889344
Change-Id: I643d3298bc8effd08741282a956c221f9d67d378
Rather than branching on whether the return type is ByMoveWrapper within
ReturnAction itself, hoist the distinction to outside. This allows the main
class template to be modified without worrying about this special case, which
means we can stop using a shared pointer to the value (introduced as a
linked_ptr in commit 3d1c78b2bf to support ByMove) in this commit and simplify
the class template further in a future commit with the eventual aim of directly
supporting move-only result types.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 445938943
Change-Id: I7bc71ea301d5e493ac6ecbe57d62738a48a2721a
Commit a070cbd91c added an implicit cast to this path but didn't leave a very
clear explanation for why it was desirable, a clear example, or even test
coverage. Add a better comment and a test that fails when the implicit cast is
removed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 444871311
Change-Id: I127982fa8d5bce9b6d1b68177c12dc0709449164
This is necessary for generic support of these actions, since `DoAll` is a
frequently-used action wrapper.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 444561964
Change-Id: I02edb55e35ab4207fbd71e371255a319c8253136
This provides a type-safe way for an action to express that it wants to be
called only once, or to capture move-only objects. It is a generalization of
the type system-evading hack in ByMove, with the improvement that it works for
_any_ action (including user-defined ones), and correctly expresses that the
action can only be used with WillOnce. I'll make existing actions benefit in a
future commit.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 440496139
Change-Id: I4145d191cca5655995ef41360bb126c123cb41d3
Avoid instantiating functions like std::get<index> for an out of range index
when doing SFINAE on the invocability of the action itself.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 439415110
Change-Id: Ifc20285a6d526c34830870cd1910c2b2b92e1e81
When built with `--define=absl=1` under Bazel, GoogleTest
flags use ABSL_FLAG instead of GoogleTest's own implementation.
There are some minor behavior differences in this mode.
The most notable difference is that unrecognized flags result
in a flag parsing error, and are not returned to the user though
a modified argc/argv, unless they appear after the positional
argument delimiter ("--").
For example, to pass a non-Abseil flag, you would have to do
./mytest --gtest_color=false -- --myflag=myvalue
The documentation at https://abseil.io/docs/cpp/guides/flags
may be helpful in understanding the behavior.
There are some other minor differences. For example,
passing --help results in the program returning 1 instead of 0.
https://github.com/google/googletest/issues/3646
PiperOrigin-RevId: 439312700
Change-Id: Id696a25f50f24a5b1785c45ca8fa59794f86fd5c
The one large test does not link in limited memory environments
Closes#3653
PiperOrigin-RevId: 436753193
Change-Id: Idd59b6509994fc642147b88279ee791cd1d7bdd0
A few tests are examining code locations and looking af the resulting line
numbers to verify that GoogleTest shows those to users correctly. Some of those
locations change when clang-format is run. For those locations, I've wrapped
portions in:
// clang-format off
...
// clang-format on
There may be other locations that are currently not tickled by running
clang-format.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 434844712
Change-Id: I3a9f0a6f39eff741c576b6de389bef9b1d11139d
This catches when a client creates an action and discards it, thinking that the action has actually been applied to something.
This will help people who make the mistake of defining, for example, both `void Use(Foo*, Bar)` and `ACTION_P(Use, bar) { Use(arg, bar); }` for later application to a Foo. With such an overload, a client may then write `Use(bar);`, selecting the Action<> overload and being confused why nothing happens.
This also catches when a client defines their own action in terms of an ACTION_P()-generated one, invokes the Action<>'s builder, and then fails to invoke the resulting action, thinking it's operating on the outer action's parameters.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 433197479
Change-Id: I98e4389150d01a5e753230113016d9fc38b1d260
